Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
http://bit.ly/2MY13A6
DNP 810 Week 5 Case Report Part 3 GCU
Details:
You will be creating a case report in stages over four course
topics. This assignment will add to your previous work in Topic 3. Use an
example from your own personal practice, experience, or own personal/family;
however, simulated cases are not acceptable for practice hours and therefore
not acceptable for this assignment. Examples might include a patient with
Duchesne’s muscular dystrophy. Huntington’s disease, Down’s syndrome, sickle
cell anemia, BRCA 1 or BRCA 2 mutations, or other genetic disorder that you
and/or the organization you practice in may specialize in treating.
General
Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful
completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric.
Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become
familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to
use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is
located in the Student Success Center.
- This assignment requires that at
least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and
at least one in-text citation from each source be included.
- You
are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the
directions in the Student Success Center.
Directions:
For this assignment (Part 3 of the Case Report), write a
1,000-1,250 word paper incorporating genetics information learned from assigned
readings in Topics 1-5. Include the following:
- Examine how genetics can
influence policy issues.
- Discuss any nutritional
influences for the cause of this disease.
- Discuss the process of
nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health, prevention,
screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment, and
monitoring of treatment effectiveness.
- Discuss
the prevalence rates, testing, treatment, and prognosis as they relate to
human nutrition.
Portfolio
Practice Hours:
Practice
immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are
intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice
setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in
the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the
student, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock
hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice
immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using
real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of
evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the
course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in
a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for
practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following
after the references section of your paper:
Practice
Hours Completion Statement DNP-810
I,
(INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in
association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also
tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for
verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my
faculty and practice mentor.
|
|
Case Report: Part 3
|
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%
|
2
Less Than
Satisfactory
74.00%
|
3
Satisfactory
79.00%
|
4
Good
87.00%
|
5
Excellent
100.00%
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
25.0 %Examination of How Genetics
Can Influence Policy Issues
|
Examination
of how genetics can influence policy issues is not present.
|
Examination
of how genetics can influence policy issues is present but incomplete.
|
Examination
of how genetics can influence policy issues is present but done at a
perfunctory level.
|
Examination
of how genetics can influence policy issues is clearly presented.
Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though
dated sources.
|
Examination
of how genetics can influence policy issues is clearly presented.
Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current scholarly
sources.
|
|
25.0 %Discussion of Any
Nutritional Influences for the Cause of This Disease
|
Discussion
of any nutritional influences for the cause of this disease is not present.
|
Discussion
of any nutritional influences for the cause of this disease is present but
incomplete.
|
Discussion
of any nutritional influences for the cause of this disease is present but
done at a perfunctory level.
|
Discussion
of any nutritional influences for the cause of this disease is clearly
present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly
though dated sources.
|
Discussion
of any nutritional influences for the cause of this disease is clearly
present. Discussion is insightful. Information presented is from current
scholarly sources.
|
|
20.0 %Discussion of the Process of
Nutritional Assessment and Counseling as It Relates to Health, Prevention,
Screening, Diagnostics, Prognostics, Selection of Treatment, and Monitoring
of Treatment Effectiveness
|
The
process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health,
prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment,
and monitoring of treatment effectiveness is not presented.
|
The
process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health,
prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment,
and monitoring of treatment effectiveness is presented but incomplete.
|
The
process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health,
prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment,
and monitoring of treatment effectiveness is presented but done at a perfunctory
level.
|
The
process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health,
prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment,
and monitoring of treatment effectiveness is clearly presented. Discussion
is convincing. Information presented is from mostly current scholarly but
some outdated sources are used.
|
The
process of nutritional assessment and counseling as it relates to health,
prevention, screening, diagnostics, prognostics, selection of treatment,
and monitoring of treatment effectiveness is clearly presented. Discussion
is insightful and detailed. Information presented is from current scholarly
sources.
|
|
20.0 %Organization and
Effectiveness
|
|
7.0 %Thesis Development and
Purpose
|
Paper
lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not
clear.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It
is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the
purpose.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained
within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and
Construction
|
Statement
of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not
support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible
sources.
|
Sufficient
justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument
is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents
minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly,
supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and
conclusion bracket the thesis.
|
Argument
shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There
is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most
sources are authoritative.
|
Clear
and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive
and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing
(includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent
and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are
present.
|
Some
mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to
the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language
are used.
|
Prose
is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A
variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer
is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of
appropriate style for the major and assignment)
|
Template
is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly.
|
Appropriate
template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of
control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate
template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be
present.
|
Appropriate
template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All
format elements are correct.
|
|
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text
citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing
and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style)
|
No
reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Reference
page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
Reference
page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
Reference
page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is
appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
|
In-text
citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation
of cited sources is free of error.
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment