Just Click on Below Link To Download This Course:
http://bit.ly/2BTJECt
DNP 810 Topic Week 4 Genetic Counseling GCU
Details:
With the increase in knowledge around genetic issues, it
is important that all health care providers are prepared to have thorough
genetic-based discussions now with their patients. In this assignment, you will
synthesize your knowledge into a client case with a real or potential genetic
health-related illness.
General
Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful
completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric.
Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become
familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to
use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is
located in the Student Success Center.
- This
assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research
sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each
source be included.
- You are required to submit this
assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student
Success Center.
- Use
the Surgeon General’s Family History Tool at (http://www.hhs.gov/familyhistory/portrait/index.html) to complete this assignment.
Directions:
Write a 1,000-1,250 word paper addressing a client case
that might benefit from the process of genetic counseling.
Describe the reason for the genetic counseling based on
the findings from your completion of the history tool.
Discuss the possible reactions the patient may have to
your counseling and how to avoid negative reactions.
Imagine this assignment as if you are giving this
counseling to a patient. Discuss the following:
- Health.
- Prevention
- Screening
- Diagnostics
- Prognostics
- Selection of treatment
- Monitoring
of treatment effectiveness
Portfolio
Practice Hours:
Practice
immersion assignments are based on your current course objectives, and are
intended to be application-based learning using your real-world practice
setting. These assignments earn practice immersion hours, and are indicated in
the assignment by a Portfolio Practice Hours statement which reminds you, the
student, to enter in a corresponding case log in Typhon. Actual clock
hours are entered, but the average hours associated with each practice
immersion assignment is 10.
You are required to complete your assignment using
real-world application. Real-world application requires the use of
evidence-based data, contemporary theories, and concepts presented in the
course. The culmination of your assignment must present a viable application in
a current practice setting. For more information on parameters for
practice immersion hours, please refer to DNP resources in the DC Network.
To earn portfolio practice hours, enter the following
after the references section of your paper:
Practice
Hours Completion Statement DNP-810
I,
(INSERT NAME), verify that I have completed (NUMBER OF) clock hours in
association with the goals and objectives for this assignment. I have also
tracked said practice hours in the Typhon Student Tracking System for
verification purposes and will be sure that all approvals are in place from my
faculty and practice mentor.
Genetic
Counseling
|
1
Unsatisfactory 0.00% |
2
Less Than Satisfactory 74.00% |
3
Satisfactory 79.00% |
4
Good 87.00% |
5
Excellent 100.00% |
|
70.0 %Content
|
|
|||||
25.0 %Discussion of the Reason for the Genetic
Counseling Based on the Findings From Your Completion of the History Tool
|
Discussion
of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your
completion of the history tool is not present.
|
Discussion
of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your
completion of the history tool is present but incomplete.
|
Discussion
of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your
completion of the history tool is present but done at a perfunctory level.
|
Discussion
of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your
completion of the history tool is clearly present and convincing. Information
presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
|
Discussion
of the reason for the genetic counseling based on the findings from your
completion of the history tool is clearly present and insightful. Information
presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
25.0 %Discussion of the Possible Reactions the Patient
May Have to Your Counseling and How to Avoid Negative Reactions
|
Discussion
of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to
avoid negative reactions is not present.
|
Discussion
of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to
avoid negative reactions is present but incomplete.
|
Discussion
of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to
avoid negative reactions is present but done at a perfunctory level.
|
Discussion
of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to
avoid negative reactions is clearly present. Discussion is convincing.
Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
|
Discussion
of the possible reactions the patient may have to your counseling and how to
avoid negative reactions is clearly present. Discussion is insightful.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
20.0 %Proposal of What You Will Say to the Patient
Including the Many Points Offered in the Assignment
|
Proposal
of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the
assignment is not presented.
|
Proposal
of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the
assignment is presented but incomplete.
|
Proposal
of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the
assignment is presented but done at a perfunctory level.
|
Proposal
of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the
assignment is clearly presented. Discussion is convincing. Information
presented is from mostly current scholarly but some outdated sources are
used.
|
Proposal
of what you will say to the patient including the many points offered in the
assignment is clearly presented. Discussion is insightful and detailed.
Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
|
|
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
|
|
|||||
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose
|
Paper
lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not
clear.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is
descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
|
Thesis
and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained
within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
|
|
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction
|
Statement
of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not
support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
|
Sufficient
justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There
are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
|
Argument
is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal
justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the
purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the
thesis.
|
Argument
shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is
a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources
are authoritative.
|
Clear
and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and
compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
|
|
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
|
Surface
errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.
Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
|
Frequent
and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in
language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are
present.
|
Some
mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the
reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
used.
|
Prose
is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A
variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
|
Writer
is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
|
|
10.0 %Format
|
|
|||||
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
|
Template
is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed
correctly.
|
Appropriate
template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of
control with formatting is apparent.
|
Appropriate
template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be
present.
|
Appropriate
template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
|
All
format elements are correct.
|
|
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for
paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as
appropriate to assignment and style)
|
No
reference page is included. No citations are used.
|
Reference
page is present. Citations are inconsistently used.
|
Reference
page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are
appropriately documented, although some errors may be present.
|
Reference
page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is
appropriate and citation style is usually correct.
|
In-text
citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of
cited sources is free of error.
|
|
100 %Total Weightage
|
No comments:
Post a Comment